The #1 Digital News Source for Retail Loss Prevention,
IT Security & Safety Executives throughout North America

   
Back to
d-ddaily.net SUBSCRIBE
FREE Daily
eNews Special
Reports Spotlight on
Leadership ORC
News Canadian
Push Vendor
Spotlights LP
Newswire Group LP
Selfies
 
Thought Challenge 6-10-13
The D&D Daily e-Newsletter for the LP & Safety Industry
 


 


The FRUSTRATION of Loss Prevention's way of calculating an ROI

By Francis Clark
VP Business Development
Profitect



I very recently read of a case of lottery fraud in D&D and clipped these 3 lines out to make a point about how Loss Prevention’s use of LOSS as Value is misleading in examples of ROI.

√ $82,000 in losses
√ Validated Losses: $1210
√ Total value to client: $82,000

Obviously, the ONLY VALUE to the client was that the blood-letting stopped at $82,000 in LOSS. Not one penny of this proclaimed ‘value’ will show up in anyone’s pay check, bonus or shareholder benefit. It’s LOSS. Depending on the profit margin of the client and ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF SALES will have to be recorded to offset this NON VALUE-LOSS.

The additional frustrating element is that lottery schemes are ‘on going’ and by not being able to detect the initial patterns of deception the LOSS accumulates to $82,000 or greater before being discovered.

And likely this LOSS represents only the face value of the tickets scammed which has to be reimbursed to the lottery commission and does NOT include labor to investigate, potential prosecution costs, court costs, time in court away from work costs and ‘if’ a restitution scenario is developed...the cost to manage that scenario.

In addition, by publicizing this high LOSS amount the shift is definitely in the direction or REWARD than PENALTY. If the person hadn’t been so greedy, had been more clever, etc., it could have been more OR they would have moved on before being discovered. The ‘value’ of the $82,000 is what the their enjoyed, not the client!

Over and over we see high value lottery schemes and to me, VALUE would be in detection at a very much lower LOSS to the client but is still a LOSS.

But I’ve also seen these ROI conversations taken to an even greater extreme where it is claimed that ‘if we weren’t using X to find this the losses would likely have climbed to $146,000 until traditional audit or reporting scenarios would have tumbled to it...so then they claim the even higher value as part of an ROI. REALLY?

I guess the perfect parting shot would be to find my ‘rose colored glasses’ so I can spin of a value proposition for a missing tractor trailer of iPads...wonder how much ‘value’ I can get out of that LOSS??



What's Happening?

Coming soon:

Mobile App's

LP Show Coverage

The Top 10

 

Thought Challenge 6-10-13
Powered by Design By J, LLC
ASP.NET Shopping Cart Software